María Fideliz de la Paz, Juan Alvarez de Toledo, Rafael Ignacio Barraquer, Joaquín Barraquer.
Barraquer Ophthalmology Centre, Barcelona, Spain
Acta Ophtalmologica, vol. 86, issue 7, pages 735–740, November 2008
© 2008 The Authors

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term visual prognosis of corneal and ocular surface surgery in patients with congenital aniridia.

Methods: Retrospective comparative interventional case series on 88 eyes of 45 patients with congenital aniridia treated and/or operated on from 1956 to present. Corneal and ocular surface findings were identified and patients were classified into operated (group I) or not operated (group II). Long-term best-ever best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), final BCVA and long-term delta BCVA (long-term best-ever BCVA – .final BCVA) were recorded and compared between the two groups, and between the limbal transplant (LT) (group I-A) and the penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (group I-B) patients. Postoperative results were also compared.

Results: Limbal insufficiency was present in 58% of eyes and dense central corneal opacities were present in 27% of eyes. As a primary surgery, limbal allograft was performed in 10 eyes and PK in 13 eyes. The mean long-term follow-up times were 23 years in group I and 16 years in group II. The mean long-term delta BCVA was 0.032 in group I and 0.028 in group II. Comparisons of the VA means were insignificant (long-term best-ever, final BCVA and long-term delta BCVA). When comparing the LT and PK groups, mean longterm delta BCVA was 0.0328 in group I-A and 0.0382 in group I-B. Mean postoperative delta BCVA was 0.028 in group I-A and 0.048 in group I-B. We found no statistical significance between the LT and the PK groups as regards long-term postoperative BCVA results.

Conclusion: Long-term visual prognosis does not differ whether or not the patient undergoes surgery for aniridic keratopathy. LT and PK have comparable results over 5 years of follow-up because of the eventual failure of transplanted allografts.

Keywords: congenital aniridia – limbal insufficiency – limbal transplantation – penetrating keratoplasty – prognosis

Link to full article:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01293.x/abstract

2 Responses to Long-term visual prognosis of corneal and ocular surface surgery in patients with congenital aniridia

  1. Edna Odegaard says:

    I have had aniridia condition since birth. My Boston K-Pro’s have been put in my eye’s and I wish now I hadn’t. I just had membranes taken off my retina’s in both eye’s in the last years or so. I can only see a slight light in my right eye since 2-2-11. I had also laszer done on right too to keep the pressure down. I’d like some information on anyone that has had any surgeries with my conditions. Thank you

    • iRosa Sánchez de Vega says:

      Dear Etna: I am very sorry that your surgery has not helped you. AS far as I understand, you underwent two surgeries in the same eye, but I would need more details about the first surgery you underwent in Boston, then we can give you more information about others in similar situation. Looking forward to hearing from you. Best regards. Rosa

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>